On the one hand, I may be "all wet" when I complain about too many drugs, side effects, harmful surgeries, and radiation damage. This report suggest that all those dastardly "things" are possibly responsible for a greater life expectancy.
Three points to ponder.
(1) is it possible that healthier "living" and better living conditions set things up such that we are able to survive a little longer even when assaulted by drugs, chemicals, surgeries, and radiation?
(2) is an increase of 0.2 years (73 days) significant - it's a 0.25% increase)?
(3) is a few extra days of "not dying" really the same as living - especially if you're in pain, unconscious, on life support, or completely unaware of who you are?
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Difference between Living and NOT DYING?
See this Amp at http://usat.ly/herPwB
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment